The word Indian means Bastard

Yes, you will find such statements on the Internet in hundreds of articles. You will find many such videos on YouTube where these types of many words have been used in relation to India or Indians. This article of mine is meant to answer those people who have misrepresented or distorted the word India or Indian. Write below, proving some such statements wrong here.

Statement - 1.

The word "Indian" means bastard, you must have read that during the British period there was a board of "Dogs and Indians are not allowed" in theaters and many public places, from this you can understand what was the value of Indians for the British.

Clarification

The word Indian means Bhartiya. Our constitution confirms this. Our constitution says "India that is Bharat". At the time when our country was a slave of the British, the matter was different. Anyone can speak anything about the slave, but today we have repulsed the British and returned them to their country. No one has the courage today, as mentioned in this article. Today, Indian means Bhartiya and those who are finding themselves great by removing their own evil, in reality there is no fool in the world more than them. I am Indian, I am Bhartiya, I am Hindustani.

Statement - 2.

If you open the Oxford Dictionary (Old), page number 789 says Indian which means "old-fashioned & criminal peoples" means backward and stereotypical criminal people.

Clarification

The word Indian, mentioned in page number 789 of the Oxford Dictionary, published in 1900 year, was written at that time according to the order of the British rule. And the way we (ie our ancestors) drove the British away and brought them to their country. In the same way, the Oxford Dictionary also had to change that edition. In the present-day Oxford Dictionary, you can see that Indian means Bhartiya, not something, and today no country in the world has the capacity to make any objectionable remarks about the 1.30 billions citizens of India. Today India means Bharat and Indian means Bhartiya and there will be no doubt in the future.

Statement - 3.

Indian means "person or couple whose parents are not married in the church". That is, the word "Indian" means children born to a couple who are illegitimate due to lack of marriage in the church, that means bastard.

Clarification

As I have made clear in the above clarification, India means Bharat and Indian means Bhartiya, then there is no need to say anything further on this. Since India was weak at that time, it was a slave, no matter who addressed it. But today no one dares to address the Indian by abusing them.

Statement - 4.

In Britain, it is a legal offense to call its citizens "Indian".

Clarification

It is a crime in Britain to call its citizens Indian. I have a question, is it good for an Indian to say Pakistani, African or otherwise. This is wrong in every country, what is new in this, those who write the article may not make any difference but I tell myself that I am an Indian. I am an Indian and if someone tells me a citizen of another country, then sure I will take legal action against him. Because I am Indian, not Pakistani, African or otherwise. I think that such rude writers must have found the answer to their question, who are twisting and presenting the truth in this way.

Statement - 5.

There are about 200 countries in the world, all those countries have their own special identity and a special name. Among these 200 countries, India is the only country whose official name is India and Bharat. Both these names have also been approved in our constitution. It is written in the Preamble of the Constitution, India, Bharat. This means that there are 2 names of the country, officially called Government of India and also called Bharat Sarkar.

Clarification

It makes me laugh to hear such thoughts whether the author of this article is more great, educated, scholar, and the world is seen than Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar, the author of the Constitution of India. In my view, there may be very few people who have seen the whole world, among them Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar. If we talk about knowledge, then I understand that the knowledge that Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar had with him will still not be available in any Indian and such people say that India has two official names in India and Bharat. I will not say much to them so much that they should have a little faith in Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar, the author of our Constitution, believe in the Constitution of India, and remove such articles from the internet if possible. It is a shame for the same writers themselves. Because they are unknowingly challenging Doctor Bhimrao Ambedkar. By the way, for the information, tell me that there are many countries in the world which have more than one name. You people search in Google, you will get the answer. As given in the example, Japan has a name, no, Japan also has more than one name, you search in Google.

Statement - 6.

What is the name of this country "Bharat" or "India"? The social worker of Lucknow has put the central government in trouble by asking the same question to the government, under the Right to Information Act i.e. RTI, what is the name of India officially? His question has created a stir in government offices as the government does not have any answer for this at the moment.

Clarification

For the information of the people, let me tell you that the Right to Information ie RTI Act has been discontinued due to similar questions from such people. Perhaps the last question under this law was that if the aliens attacked India, what steps did the Indian government take to avoid it? The Right to Information Act was then repealed. Because some people have got too much right to speak in this country, yes this is the question, some childish question. It is written on the first page of the constitution that even if India means Bharat, the central government has had difficulty in answering it. No, we think this is not a question and if someone has asked such a question, it is very silly. Because India means Bharat this is clearly stated in the Constitution. Then questions like India and Bharat should not arise and the central government should not accept such questions. This unnecessary controversy is being created with the objective of making your article public.

Statement - 7.

Knowing the real meaning of the word "INDIAN", you will be overwhelmed with shame.

Clarification

Shame, why should we be ashamed? Shame should to those who write wrongly, misprint. Whether you are the author of the article or the publisher of Oxford, we are Indian. Our Constitution has given us the name of Indian and this constitution is ours. We are proud to be our Indians. People drowned in shame, who feel mistaken for being Indian, authors of such articles drowned in shame, who object to being Indian, trick others. Why don't such writers overwhelmed with shame? Those who do not know their constitution, do not know the history of the country, and have gone on to teach the world a lesson.

Statement - 8.

The word "Indian" signifies 100 percent slavery is a hate word because those who did not marry according to the beliefs of Christian churches are called 'Indians'.

Clarification

It would be unfair to say that the word "Indian" signifies slavery. "Indian" is not a symbol of all slavery, but in the time of slavery, "Indian" meant (meaning) that the British made it different. The word "Indian" is not hateful but in the era when "Indian" was a slave of the British, racism and apartheid was at its peak and it was not only in "India" but in many countries there was a sense of racism and apartheid.

In today's perspective, nowhere has it been written that "those who do not marry according to the beliefs of the Christian churches will be called 'Indian'". Why is creating unnecessary confusion about the word "Indian", which has no basis. In any of today's dictionaries, you will find the word "Indian" to mean Bhartiya.

Statement - 9.

"We need proof that who and when this country was named" India "? Or when was it decided to call India instead of Bharat? "

Clarification

The Constitution of India confirms the name "India" and the whole world respects this confirmation. It does not matter when and by whom the word "India" was originated. It is true that India's name is "India" and I am an Indian.

If a reader feels that there is something missing or is wrong in the information (in writing or understanding) given in this article, then it is a humble request to such readers that you must give us your comments through comments. We will make changes in this article (as per requirement) on Aadhaar.

Please Share to your friends and in groups.

Thank you

For reading in Hindi Language click here (हिंदी में जानकारी के लिए यहाँ क्लिक करें )

The word Hindu means Kafir, Black, thief, Slave, Poor, Low Level People

Yes, you will find such statements on the Internet in hundreds of articles. You will also find many such videos on YouTube where such words have been used in relation to Hindu, Hinduva, Hindvi, Hind, Hindustan or Hindustani. This article of mine is meant to answer those who have misrepresented or distorted the word Hindu or Hindustani. Write below proving some such statements is wrong: -

Statement - 1.

"Hindu (hi + n + du = hin + du) This word in the Persian language means black, thief, slave, and literally means Poor looks, Low Level People."

Clarification

According to the author of the above article, India should abandon the words Hindu, Hindi, Hindustan etc. Because the word Hindu comes from the Persian word. Yes, the author is talking about that Paras country which is today a state of Iran. But there is no argument that if one word means a thief or a robber in another country, it will have the same meaning in our country also. The meaning of any word is that which we determine ourselves and not that we depend on someone else, what we mean there, we cannot change the meaning of our word from the thought of another. For example, "dog named after him" is simple: People name their pet dog after the enemy's name, ie the name of their enemy is the same name of their dog. In this way, the term Hindu has been there long ago, but when the Islamic country fundamentalists were at their peak and India was a slave to the Mughals, Islamic fundamentalists, at that time the word Hindu was presented in a distorted manner in the Arabic and Persian dictionary (such as British distorted the meaning of India that is a distorted meaning was presented in the Oxford Dictionary published in nineteen hundred years but today the meaning of the word Indian in the Oxford Dictionary is not what it was in the Dictionary published in 19 hundred years.

Now we try to understand this by another example. For example there is a country in Central Africa whose name is Burundi, so should the people of Burundi change their country name to something else. Because in some parts of North India, Burundi is a vulgar and extremely vulgar word. The first president of Bangladesh was named Mujibur Rahman. Mujibur is a very popular name in Urdu language but it is a vulgar word in Hindi or Nepali language, so should the word Mujibur be removed from the Urdu language dictionary. Many such examples can be given. But such arguments are not sufficient in themselves to stop using the name of a country or a word associated with a faith or to remove that word from its dictionary.

Our humble request to the author of the above article is that please show me some references that are reliable because there is a question of lifestyle of 130 crore people who call themselves Hindus. We do not know when, where, how, and why the word Arya or Sanatan became a Hindu. But we have been a Hindu ever since we were born. So it does not make any sense what Hindu means in Parsi dictionary. For example, the word Allah in Islam is derived from the Sanskrit word Allah. Which means the word Allah is used in Sanskrit to invoke Goddess, that is Goddess or Shakti. Like Yaa Devi Sarva Bhuteshu .... and in islam Yaa Allah ..... But no Muslim has ever said that in Sanskrit, Allah means Goddess, then I should choose some other word for my Allah. Because everyone has determined the meaning of the word Allah according to their own, then it does not matter to Muslims that in Sanskrit, Goddess is called Allah. Similarly, it does not matter what Hindu means in Persian dictionary. Therefore, you talk about this country, does Hindu have any other meaning inside India. Do you know the Constitution of India, know the judiciary of India, the Supreme Court has also given some meaning to Hindu, is it aware? What do you want to prove by ignoring all these things and presenting them by distorting the word Hindu. The reference you are referring to is not accepted. Please do not discredit the Hindu word by begging and explaining such nonsensical things.

You understand the meaning of the Hindu word in the international dictionary and then say something. The International Dictionary is today's universally accepted dictionary. You will find the meaning of the word Hindu on the Internet. You have no objection to separate yourself from the Hindu, but you cannot make such objectionable remarks about those who are Hindus. The Constitution of India gives everyone the right to speak but It does not give right to change one's faith, one's lifestyle. You cannot say that the word Hindu is a rebuke. In India, the word Hindu does not mean abuses, it is a way of life. Even in the international dictionary, the Hindu word does not mean abusive, it is lifestyle. If a Muslim goes to the Arab country, then the Muslim of the Arab country addresses the Muslim of India as a Hindu in Arabia. If the word Hindu was abusive, one Muslim would not call another Muslim a Hindu. The Hindu word is not an abuses, you should study it first and then write some kind of article on it. The word Hindu in the Persian language can mean abuse in the country of Iran. But it cannot be interpreted that the word Hindu in India also means abusive.

According to the International Dictionary and Kerrybrown (Hindutva Webster's Comprehensive Compilation of the Third International Dictionary of English Language): -

It is a complex mixture of social, cultural and religious beliefs and perspectives. It developed in the Indian subcontinent. It believes in humanity, based on ethnicity. It is an idea that believes in all kinds of beliefs and believes in religion, karma, ahimsa, sanskar and moksha. This is the path of knowledge, the path of affection. One who believes in rebirth. This is a way of life which is a Hindu ideology.

In his famous book 'The Essential Teachings of Hinduism', English writer Kerry Brown has expressed his thoughts in these words -

The culture that we know today as Hindu culture and what is called Indian Sanatan Dharma or eternal rule is a larger principle than the religion which the people of the West understand. No one believes in any God or believes in any God, yet he is a Hindu. It is a way of life, it is a state of mind.

The Supreme Court of India has defined Hindutva as "the lifestyle of Indians"

Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj wanted to establish a Hindu nation.

Hindutva was adopted by the great thinker and freedom fighter Veer Savarkar.

Dr. Radhakrishnan said in his book "The Hindu View of Life" that Hindutva emphasizes social life and associates those who are bound by moral values. It is not a sect but a community of people who are trying to get the truth firmly.

Swami Vivekananda had said - "Hindutva is not a religion, it is a good way of life".

Mahatma Gandhi considered Hindutva to be the service of humanity. Shiva is the creature for them. Human service is God service. It was this spirit that brought Mahatma Gandhi to politics.

Jawaharlal Nehru in his book "Discovery of India" has written that the words Hindu and Indo are derived from the Indus. He has not taken the word Hindu as abusive or otherwise.

Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar hate Hindutva. But he has not said anywhere that the word Hindu means abusive. He hated the politics of Hindutva and not Hindu word. If you think that I do not know about the complete thoughts of Baba Saheb Bhimrao Ambedkar or if Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar has abused the meaning of the Hindu word in any of his works, then please comment.

No freedom fighter of India has taken the meaning of the word Hindu as abusive but as an Indian way of life. People may have different ideologies in relation to Hindu Nation, but no one has believed that the word Hindu is abusive.

If a writer has to make a debate in this regard, I will welcome him when and where I say I am ready to debate that the Hindu word was there before the arrival of the Persian word and in Persian and Arabic only to discredit the Hindu word. His meaning has been twisted and presented for me. If anyone has courage, then debate with me, I will be happy.

Statement - 2.

"Hindu word means Kafir (Black African People, atheist)"

Clarification

The Hindu word is derived from the Indus and does not mean Kafir at all. I will mention Kafir in my next article. Here I will say that the word Hindu is misrepresented and misrepresented. The word Hindu does not mean Kafir at all. The Hindu word is derived from the Indus and has been preceded by the origin of the Urdu word, hence the Hindu word does not mean Kafir. I will present the meaning of Kafir in my next article.

Statement - 3.

"Who are Hindus, does not know central government: RTI

New Delhi. In the light of Indian constitution and laws, information about the meaning and definition of Hindu word was sought from the Central Government under RTI, but the government could not provide this information. RTI activist resident of Neemuch in Madhya Pradesh told that he had asked the Central Government under RTI what is the meaning and definition of Hindu word as per Indian Constitution and laws? He said that in the reply sent by the Ministry of Home Affairs on my RTI, it was said that the requisite information is not available with the Central Public Information Officer. The RTI activist said that in his application, he wanted to know from the government on what basis in the country a society is considered Hindu and Hindus are seen as majority. But the only response from the Ministry of Home Affairs was that the above information is not available with the CPIO. "

Clarification

For the information of the people, let me tell you that the Right to Information ie RTI Act has been discontinued due to similar questions from such people. Perhaps the last question under this law was that if the aliens attacked India, what steps did the Indian government take to avoid it? The Right to Information Act was then repealed. Because some people have got too much right to speak in this country, yes this is the question. The term Hindu has been defined in various judgments of the Supreme Court between 1965 and 1995 and states that the word Hindu means "the lifestyle of Indians". Despite this, why was RTI questioned? This is a webinar statement, in fact nothing like this has happened.

Statement - 4.

"Muslims, Muslim attackers, Mughals have given us the Hindu word but we are not Sanatan, we are Arya"

Clarification

If Muslims have given Hindu names to Hindus, then why Indian Muslims are called Hindus in Arab countries. Arabic Muslims call Indian Muslims Hindu based on the definition of the Hindu word mentioned in the International Dictionary. Our trade with Arab countries and with Europe is very old. Even before the birth of Islam, Arab merchants traded with India. Therefore, it is not fair to say that Muslims gave us the word Hindu or that Muslim invaders gave us the name Hindu. Traders from Arab countries may have given us Hindu names, but this does not mean that Muslims or Muslim invaders or Mughals gave us Hindu names. This statement is absolutely untrue.

Statement - 5.

"The secret of the origin of the word Hindu is the first letter from the Himalayas and Indu is the synonym of the moon from which the Indian period is calculated. The last letter is taken from it, ie Hindu word is formed"

Clarification

It is not that the "H" of the Himalayas and Indu were taken from the moon and we made them Hindus. There is no justification behind this. There is no argument as to why. It has been pointed out by those who have not been able to correctly prove the word Hindu that the word Hindu has been preceded by the origin of the Arabic and Urdu words and is derived from the Indus.

If a reader feels that there is something missing or is wrong in the information (in writing or understanding) given in this article, then it is a humble request to such readers that you must give us your comments through comments box. We will make changes in this article (as per requirement).

Please Share to your friends and in groups.

Thank You

For reading in Hindi Language click here (हिंदी में जानकारी के लिए यहाँ क्लिक करें )